Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jeremy's avatar

Socialism is not just a disease, but a pandemic.

The latest poll by the Institute of Directors (IoD) found that business leaders’ confidence in their own company plunged to -20 immediately after the Budget, down from zero in October. This was the second-lowest monthly reading on record. Confidence has only ever been lower in April 2020, when Britain was reeling from the pandemic and lockdown restrictions.

The IoD said that bosses’ expectations for revenue growth, hiring and investment have all fallen.

Reeves is choosing to return our economy to pandemic days.

She is not the first. Attlee, Wilson/Callaghan, Blair/Brown all ended up busting the economy. It's just a question of how long it takes, which is dependent on two factors:

1. How socialist they are

2. How bad the economy was when they inherited it.

This government is the most socialist ever, and inherited an economy already on its knees. No prizes for guessing the inevitable outcome. With any luck the bond markets will force them to go. But more likely they will just force them to be a bit less socialist, which will risk alienating their dwindling loyal supporters, but mean we are stuck with them.

It is interesting to apply the two factors to the previous 14 years:

1. They were mildly socialist.

2. They inherited a bust economy, as they always do, courtesy of Labour.

As a result of 1, they presided over a woke obsessed decline. But make no mistake, they were a million times better than the current crew.

It will not be good enough next election for those on the right to sit on their hands and whine that they have nobody to vote for, so voting for nobody. That led to this government's massive majority, more than the "split of the right" between Reform and the Conservatives. It may be that the left wing vote is split between Labour, LibDems, Your Party (finally we know its name) (Silly Party), and Green (Very Silly Party).

One of the problems we face is that some 18% of voters actually think that they should vote for a party led by a communist lunatic who believes in no borders at all, no landlords, the legalisation of all drugs, and breast enhancement through the power of thought, whose second in command appears to be a radical Islamist. And another cohort would vote for the anarchist omnishambles created by a has been Marxist and a rabid trans ideologue that doesn't think it needs a leader. As Sigourney Weaver famously said in Aliens, "did IQs just drop sharply while I was away?"

Which brings me to my final question. If Starmer and Reeves do go, which of the brainless lickspittle boneheads that form the cabinet (or recently were forced out of it) would you replace them with?

Paul Cassidy's avatar

The sobering fact, however, is that, if Reeves is ousted, there is nobody on the Labour benches who wouldn’t be as bad and probably a whole lot worse to replace her as chancellor.

71 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?