Discussion about this post

User's avatar
P Wilson's avatar

Hi LSO, good article again, though if anything you’re being far too optimistic, this is New Labour after all!

However, I do want to pick up on one thing, which is using the word apathy to describe the voters who are driven by what is on offer by our political system to not voting. Apathy implies not caring, passive acceptance of whatever the result is. I do not think this actually describes what is happening.

It suits the political elite to push this word to describe voters, as it implies their consent by default to the results of the election. I do not see this. It isn’t that people do not care what happens anymore, or that they cannot be bothered to go out and vote. Rather, they are actively *choosing* not to vote. What is on offer is so universally bad that there is no “least worst option”. None of the major parties in any way represents them.

Some argue in favour of voting for minor parties, but even if a representative minor party exists, our FPTP electoral system is deliberately designed to ensure that breaking through into the electable mainstream is virtually impossible without the collapse of the one incumbents to make room.

Furthermore, a key part of our democratic process is not just voting for the winner, but accepting and being bound by the result even if you lose - “loser’s consent”. You accept the choice on offer and agree to be bound by the will of the majority, whatever that turns out to be. I suggest that morally, participating in the process implies that you are accepting the choice on offer and giving that loser’s consent.

What I think is happening is something far more profound. In the absence of any meaningful choice, of any chance of being represented, we are seeing the rise of despair. In that instance, not voting is the only meaningful way to signal that you refuse to grant that losers consent; to accept the moral legitimacy of the outcome (whoever “wins”); that you want real, fundamental change in the entire political system and not just a tweaked set of identikit policies from the same tired set of parties. *Choosing* not to vote for any of the available parties is the only way we have left, within our democratic system, to say that we want a genuinely fresh choice.

I note that the article you link to with respect to voter apathy and disinterest does not actually use either of these words to describe how voters are feeling and acting- it uses the word despair, and calls for a genuinely new offer. Please don’t use the word apathy, it’s the word which will be used by our elites to legitimise themselves, and I think people, in not voting are now moving towards a position of withdrawing their consent in the validity of our broken and unrepresentative system.

Julie Dee's avatar

A great synopsis on what life will be like under Labour. Great piece.

I personally think they are two sides of the same coin and that Starmer is being brought in to further a phase of an already determined agenda. A phase that will further normalise ‘trans’, more ‘mental illness’ and giving up more to ‘save the planet’.

161 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?