‘If we can put twelve of us. On the Moon. And bring us back safely. Then we can solve anything. ‘
These are the words of our fatherly host Tom Hanks, as he closes the utterly jawdropping Moonwalkers instillation at the Lightroom in Kings Cross in London. Which is, luckily for me, just a stone’s throw from my house.
It is a mesmerising experience. Imagine being inside a room where every wall is an IMAX screen. And onto each is projected a series of immense images chronicling Apollo 11, the first Moon landing of July 1969, and the subsequent five NASA manned Moon missions, until the last, Apollo 17, on the 11th of December 1972.
So almost exactly fifty one years ago.
I was blown away by the experience. Not just because I can be a bit of a space nerd. But mainly because of the unique way in which the Lightroom experience clearly portrayed, in photos and film footage, blown up to the size of a house, how utterly different the world that sent men to the Moon really was, when compared to our world today.
The Moon after all, has not changed one iota in those fifty plus years. Yet the Earth, and more importantly the people who live on it, have become unrecognisable. Almost an alien species.
Our Apollo journey begins with John F Kennedy’s speech of September 12 1962. When he sets out his vision, a vision he would not live to see, that ‘before the decade is out’, NASA would send a man to the Moon and ‘return [him] safely’ to Earth.
Sure we know that he made this speech in response to the Soviet Union’s extra terrestrial great leap forward. First Sputnik, then Yuri Gagarin. The Americans were playing catch up.
But that does not diminish the chills you feel, even today, when a youthful, confident, convinced and convincing, John F. Kennedy stands before that immense crowd of secure, white shirted, forward looking American students at Rice University and says
‘We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard,’
How things have changed. Now we run from the hard. We shy away from the difficult. Avoid every challenge. And instead seek refuge in mediocrity and safteyism.
We no longer seek to be the best. Striving for excellence is frowned upon, and dismissed as supremacist. Winning, except within clearly defined boundaries, is a transgression of the highest order.
The frontier spirit has been rebranded as shameful colonialism. Curiosity has been reframed as troublemaking. Exploration is suspect. Maths is racist. Science has been replaced by emotion.
We no longer celebrate those special few who are possessed of The Right Stuff. Now there must be prizes for all.
The other thing that seems shocking today about JFK’s speech is how he maps out the milestones of human progress. The steam engine. Christianity. The printing press. Nuclear power. The motor car and the aeroplane. Corner stones of western civilisation. All of which have been lately recast as irredeemably wicked, sinful instruments of colonialism, racism, environmental catastrophe and oppression.
Not for JFK. Fifty years ago these totems of progress were rightly celebrated as the stepping stones they were. Giant leaps which lifted humanity from a grim pre industrial past, to the giddy heights of modern western civilisation, with all its abundance, freedoms and universal benefits.
Compare if you dare JFK’s spine tingling rallying cry, his clarion call to all of humanity to rise up and shatter the very shackles which bind us to this planet, with Vice President (Vice President of the USA!) Kamala Harris’ brain numbingly incoherent pronouncements on space travel.
Or even former Prime Minister Boris Johnson at climate change conference COP 26 in 2021, when he literally apologised to the world on behalf of Britain, for being the cradle of the Industrial Revolution.
We have become embarrassed of ourselves.
And I suppose, rightly so.
If the proud engineers, mathematicians, builders and visionaries who sent men to the Moon fifty years ago were introduced to the leaders of today, what would they make of them?
And what would they make of the rest us?
Instead of building cities on the Moon we are chopping bits off our children, and calling it Progress.
They would think us mad.
The ambition expressed in JFK’s speech was breathtaking.
This was 1962, less than twenty years after the Second World War, and almost ten years before the microprocessor was invented, five years before Britain had colour television, and back when there were parts of the UK where half the homes still had an outside toilet.
And yet the American President had the self confidence to look at the Moon, hanging untouchable in the night sky, and declare, we can go there.
Imagine the faith he must have had in his nation’s abilities, and the abilities of his fellow men, to make that call.
To commit a country’s resources to that endeavour. To spend so much money. (Yes, there were lots of complaints about that even then.) So much human capital. It is beyond comprehension.
As you stand in the Lightroom and marvel at the boneshaking lift off of the Apollo 11 rocket, as it carries three tiny humans across the vast vacant vacuum to the Moon. It takes a moment to step back and truly realise. Men made this.
Men made this because they refused to be constrained, hobbled and bound to just one planet. To the limits of the past.
Feel the roar of the engines, the bellow of this immense steel monster straining, and ultimately breaking, its leash, and know, that with their ambition, their hands and their brains,
Men. Made. This.
As I watched the crowd of men and women in Mission Control congratulating each other for accomplishing the almost unimaginable feat of building a machine out of metal, fabric, glass and mathematics, that was capable of landing a human being on the Moon, I wondered how this same scene would be greeted today.
Thoughtful and balanced news reader Jon Snow would no doubt take one look at this room full of engineers, technicians and specialists, sneer at their superhuman accomplishment and declare that ‘he had never seen so many white faces in one place.’
Whilst the modern BBC would be unlikely to focus its attention on the incredible dedication and resolve it took to accomplish this incredible feat, but would swiftly change the subject, and nod along as some angry academic demanded we decolonise astrophysics.
Today we are so much less than yesterday’s proud men and women. They held their heads high and wished for the stars. We crane our necks downward, eyes fixed on our iPhones.
In 1969 America was a proud nation. Sure, maybe in some regards too proud (Shout out to the hubris of Vietnam). But nonetheless a beacon of progress, freedom, and prosperity, something for the world to aspire to.
Now it hates itself. More divided than at any time since the Civil War, it is led by those who are repelled by their own people, history and legacy.
It feels as if we are no longer a civilisation capable of such things as Apollo. More interested in squabbling among ourselves over crumbs than reaching to the heavens.
And when someone does step up. A maverick like Elon Musk. He is considered an outlier by the establishment, a loon to be pilloried and denigrated for his riches, his differences and his ambition. A carbuncle to be smoothed away, rather than a visionary to be followed.
It has been fifty one years, since a human stood on the Moon. Fifty one years.
Apollo 17 is like a full stop. The moment humanity as a species ceased moving forwards and began to regress, the beginning of our spiral of self imposed decline.
As Hanks says,
‘If we can put twelve of us. On the moon. And bring us back safely. Then we can solve anything. ‘
Yet we choose to solve nothing.
In the face of a virus which only threatens the very old and the very vulnerable, we cower in our homes.
Confronted by the fixable problem of climate change we catastrophise. We don’t attempt to mitigate its effects, instead we flee, running helter skelter, toward an unattainable Net Zero future.
Which even if all goes exactly according to plan will leave us poorer, colder, and as a civilisation, vastly diminished.
We have turned our back on the world of Apollo, the world of rationality, scientific endeavour and futurism.
And have chosen instead a world where teenage prophets march against progress. Where beheaded Jewish babies have become, for some, a symbol of justice and righteous retribution. A world that has turned its back on optimism. That has lost its faith in the future. That no longer has confidence in humanity‘s abilities, much less belief in its inherent goodness.
And yet we congratulate ourselves daily for our non achievements, and wallow in narcissism.
As a species, our Ozymandian works once included a human footprint on the Moon. Now they are a semi dressed woman shaking her WAP for the kids on Tik-Tok. (And no. There isn’t a link to that.)
It is shameful.
As a civilisation we once strained outward. We defined ourselves by who we were, and what we had built.
Now we coil inward. And are encouraged to define each other by little more than the colour of our skin and our basest sexual appetites.
We once stood on the shoulders of giants. Our hands outstretched to the stars.
Today we are just a small people.
From a small planet.
******************************************
Thank you for reading Low Status Opinions.
This Substack is now coming up to the end of its first year.
And I am genuinely stunned by the response it has received. I started LSO, as the name would suggest, as a way to express opinions that those around me had no interest in hearing. And to simply get them off my chest so I didn’t go nuts.
I’ve done very little promotion. I’m hardly on Twitter, I really don’t do other social media, and I only post every couple of weeks. And yet well over one thousand of you have signed up for my newsletter. I’m very grateful to each and every one of you. Thank you.
This Substack is free. And shall remain so. But I have received many pledges, (again, unbidden) from many extremely generous readers. So far I haven’t turned on payments, but I may do in the new year. This does not mean there will be a paywall. Low Status Opinions will remain completely free. But it does mean that anyone who would like to contribute will be able to do so.
If you have thoughts about that I’d be grateful to hear them.
In the meantime please share this and other articles. It’s how I grow LSO.
And if you are new here, please subscribe.
And please feel free to comment. There were some very lively discussions after the last article.
And of course. Merry Christmas to you and yours. And thank you as ever for you continued support. See you next year!
LSO.
Why don't we make things any more? That's a great question. I ask myself often.
Governments in developed countries can't do great things any more because there is no constituency for great things. The left doesn't want to go to the moon and the right doesn't want to pay for the rocket fuel. My government in California couldn't even build a train track from Los Angeles to San Francisco. My government in the UK tried to build a train that goes from London to Manchester but could only get as far as Birmingham. There are too many forces arrayed against them and too many mischievous commentators too eager to demagogue them down.
We've lost our ability to tell ourselves stories too. Back then, we could say "We are going to the moon!" and tell a story about how it will make us great. If a president said "We are going to the moon!" now only about 5% of us would hear the story because we are so fragmented. Another 5% would see the headline in the Daily Mail or on Fox News about the government wasting money again on Holidays to the Moon. The best we can do now is to wear little Red Bonnets with Make America Great Again written across the front. And how does one Make America Great? By building a wall and making Mexico pay for it. So do we have a big, beautiful wall now? Reader, we do not. We didn't stop the boats either. The only story political parties know how to tell is how horrible the other party is.
Katherine writes that we don't have community any more because everyone has gone online (Hi, everyone online!) and joined tiny little communities like Pensioners Against Clean Air or Progressives Against Violent Speech where they don't have to talk to people who might tell stories they haven't heard before. I think there's something to that.
https://www.katherinewrites.com/p/beyond-the-white-picket-fence
As for culture, I figure that most of the new cultural products are just not for me any more. I've crossed the generation gap. I didn't need to see Cardi B's Wet Ass Pussy any more than my grandparents needed to see Elvis shake his snake hips. That doesn't trouble me very much. It does trouble me that all the Zeitgeist is in video games and Discord channels where they talk about video games. Culture is no longer a force for good. It's hidden away in forums and it's no longer a force for anything. The last cultural product to make a dent in anything was Tumblr and what a horrible dent that made! I think Tumblr is about 60% responsible for the identity politics that are tearing us apart.
But!
I believe the cultural tide is turning. We've passed peak wokeness and intersectionality causes more eye-rolling than head-nodding these days. They've had the most powerful story for a long time but it's coming to an end now and we need a new story to replace it. 'Take Back Control' and 'Stop the Boats' were never great stories and the story tellers fluffed their lines anyway. The War on ULEZ Cameras and the War Against the War Against Christmas are fake. They only appeal to conspiracy nuts and conspiracy nuts never build anything.
The root cause of all our problems is that our political parties were designed for the problems of the 1970s. There's hardly anyone who loves the Democrats or the Republicans. The only reason they get votes is because the other guys are worse.
I don't know a single person who loves the Tories or Labour either. What we need is for one of the parties to collapse into obscurity and for the other party to acknowledge that they only stuck together to keep the other guys out. Parties are not meant to be forever and we desperately need new ones.
We need a new story to tell.
The dualling of the A66 is an object lesson. In 2002:
"The consultants stated in the Final Report that the expected cost of full dualling of the A66 from Penrith to Scotch Corner was £66 million, however, by the time of the announcement of full dualling on 22 August 2002, made by the Minister for Roads, the cost had increased to £141 million. We have no explanation or information about this more than doubling in cost within nine months nor have we seen the Cost Benefit Analysis calculations upon which this new cost has been based. All the comparisons between dualling and other alternative low cost options were carried out on the basis of a cost of £66 million."
We are talking about 20 miles of dualling. It was done in the 2000s, but Blair cut the funding before the last few (but awkward) bits were done.
Today those last bits are in doubt, because the budget had gone up by 50% from £1 billion to £1.5 billion. That is 22 times more than the budget for the whole job 20 years ago. More time and money has so far been spent on digging holes, doing surveys, exploring the need for CPOs, worrying about nitrate neutrality, great crested newts, bats and biodiversity than was spent on doing the rest of it back in the 2000s, and not a square inch of tarmac has been laid.
We invent reasons why we can't do anything. Parliament has handed over sovereignty to the quangos, unelected supranational bodies, the House of Lords, the courts and the woke corporations. Stonewall has more influence on our daily lives. Ridiculous legislation starting with the Human Rights Act 1998 and including the Companies Act 2006, Climate Change Act 2008 and the Equality Act 2010 has committed governments to do things that are impractical at best. Government can be challenged in the courts on almost anything because it might impede our progress to net zero, for example.
The stifling bureaucracy of health and safety, net zero, human rights, biodiversity and so on mean that you need hundreds of pages of anodyne risk assessments, ecology reports, archaeological surveys and compliance checks before anything can be started. You can't build a house, a train line or a road within any sort of a sensible time scale.